Tag: interpersonal relations

  • Passing Through

    Passing Through

    A man went to visit a monk in the forest. After some time searching he found a small hut with smoke rising from a chimney. It was the monk’s hut. The man stopped at the entrance, knocked, and entered. Once inside he was surprised to see a single room, bare but for a table and two chairs. The monk was sitting in one of the chairs. The monk motioned the man to take a seat in the other chair.

    “How can I help?” asked the monk.

    Distracted by the sparseness of the room, the man asked, “Where are your things?”

    “Where are yours?” asked the monk.

    “But I am just passing through,” said the man.

    “So am I,” said the monk.

    Nearing retirement, but not quite there, I notice that the field of therapy is changing. The pandemic caused a shift to online work. Third-party companies manage a lot of the demand for therapy. I have adapted to the online work. But I have let go of many of the third-party contracts that used to flood my office with clients. No more flood.

    “The most flexible practice wins,” according to my business coach1. I owned that on the first of this year: I gave up my office. Now I rent it back by the day when I need it. The rest of the time I work from home.

    I’m back in the office today. Same office, but more like the monk’s hut now. Sparsely furnished. I am just passing through.

    On the drive in this morning I had uncomfortable feelings. I recalled the work of Les Greenberg – he was Sue Johnson’s supervisor, of EFT fame. Les taught me that emotion is a primitive sensory system. It’s supposed to tell you when things are out of whack.

    My emotions are telling me that things are out of whack. That does not necessarily mean that I should put things back into whack. I could. Or I could revel in the change.

    I have more time now to reflect on the meaning of life, which has been a lifelong passion of mine. It is the reason I studied physiology, to get an idea of what life means biochemically, and then theology, to get an idea of what life means metaphysically.

    Some years ago I met Karl Tomm, a Calgary psychiatrist recently named to the Order of Canada. When I told him about my quest for the meaning of life, he told me to read Humberto Maturana’s The Tree of Knowledge. Maturana is back on my desk (at home).

    Maturana takes a process approach to biology. He has much in common with the theologian, Paul Tillich. When a biologist and a theologian agree, it’s a special day.

    Both talk about life as arising from a buildup of complex molecules. Hydrogen is the simplest element – the simplest atom. Life as we know it requires molecules made of carbon – much more complex. How does the carbon get formed?

    The answer is in the stars. Stars are made of hydrogen. The hydrogen collects and forms a big ball, which becomes massive, and when its density reaches a critical stage, fusion begins. The hydrogen atoms combine to form heavier elements. Tremendous amounts of energy are released. This process lasts about six billion years, from birth, the beginning of fusion, to death, when its hydrogen runs out and has been converted to heavier elements – including carbon. At this point the dying star explodes – goes nova, which interestingly means “new” – and the heavier elements are spewed across the universe.

    Our earth was formed from these heavier elements.

    Our sun is only 4.5 billion years old. We have time. But we, like everything else, are just passing through. In the process, we gain complexity. And then we let it go again. Power separates us from the surrounding environment. And when we die and reconnect with our environment – Tillich calls this “love”.

    As these molecular remnants of dying stars coalesce and cool, they combine and become more complex. Carbon-based molecules can be quite complex, forming proteins and enzymes and eventually “networks of molecular reactions (which) produce the same types of molecules that they embody, while at the same time they set the boundaries of the space in which they are formed.” 2

    This is the definition of life. Not the one you learned in high school, but a process definition of life. Life is that which reproduces itself, and sets boundaries between itself and its environment. Tillich, the theologian, calls the setting of boundaries power. Life thus involves the ability to create, the ability to differentiate, and the power to do both.

    I was trying to get to my uncomfortable feelings. One of the consequences of life – a reproducible entity with power – is that living beings are constantly interacting with the environment beyond their boundaries, monitoring it for changes which could threaten their existence.

    In order to do this every living thing develops a reflex, so that whenever a change is sensed in the environment, the living thing reacts to minimize the effect of the change on its internal processes.

    If I live long enough I will say more on this.

    There’s more to this that I haven’t teased out yet, but this has bearing on what is happening to our world. Not just to my office.

    1. Lynn Grodzki, Building Your Ideal Private Practice
    2. The Tree of Knowledge, p. 37
  • How to Save the World

    Maturana and Varela, Chilean biologists, wrote an essential book called The Tree of Knowledge. They “explain” evolution according to a simple rule that even a single-celled organism can follow:

    Don’t piss off the environment.

    We talk about climate change like it is something we caused and can therefore reverse. That may be partly true. What is more true is that the climate – the environment in which we live – has been changing for millions of years. Since the earth was formed.

    The world is always changing. We can’t stop that. We can’t change it back. We can only change with it.

    For the single-celled organism to survive, it has to change as its environment changes. If it doesn’t, it dies.

    If the environment changes in such a way that the cell is perturbed – disturbed from its resting state, its homeostasis – then the cell has a simple reflex. Using what it has internally, it changes itself to adjust to the environmental change. And then it can rest again.

    As it changes to meet the environmental challenge, the cell acquires new skills. New organelles. New capabilities.

    The cell benefits from change. It survives.

    Cells that don’t change eventually die out. The environment continues to change, and after awhile the difference between what the cell needs and what the environment has to offer is too great, and the cell simply cannot survive.

    The cell also benefits because it acquires new skills. New abilities. If the temperature increases, it learns how to adjust its internal temperature accordingly, so that its chemical reactions continue in an optimal way. And by promoting this change, the cell develops strengths that it didn’t have before. And it is better equipped to meet the next challenge.

    Athletes know this. Students know this. Parents know this. Meet the daily challenge. Change with it. Learn something new. Become a little stronger. You are better prepared to meet the next challenge.

    There are millions of single cells out there still adjusting to the environment, one day at a time. But this has been going on for so long that some of the first cells who adapted to change have themselves changed so much and become so equipped that they can do what to a single cell would be unthinkable, if it could think.

    At some point cells started clumping together for mutual support. Groups of cells began to specialize, supporting other groups of cells with what they produced, and taking from them what they no longer made for themselves. A sort of free market of cell communities.

    These groups of cells became recognizable as living things. Plants, animals.

    Some of these animals became self-aware. Psychological1.

    Some of these self-aware animals became other-aware. Spiritual2. Recognizing that they exist in a world that places limits and makes demands. Recognizing that continued survival of the whole – all living things – requires a form of global cooperation.

    The next stage of our evolution remains to be seen. But the process is clear: when the environment challenges, you must respond. Use everything you have to meet the challenge. Adapt to it, become stronger, and be ready for the next challenge.

    We have acquired an impressive collection of wisdom and knowledge and history. Like a cell with well-developed organelles, we have powerful tools to meet the present environmental challenges, if we value and use everything we have.

    Roughly half of us don’t want to do this anymore. Don’t want to change. Change is hard. But not to change is like so much of mental illness in general and addiction in particular: a short-term gain for a long-term disaster.

    Adapting to a changing world means upgrading ourselves. Upgrades are hard. Not all the bugs have been worked out. There are glitches in this newest human operating system which has been handed down to us. That however is not a call to go back to Windows 1.0. Not a good survival strategy.

    If we want to save the world – save ourselves in the world, really. The world doesn’t care – all we have to do is embrace change. Acknowledge that the environment is becoming uncomfortable. Work together as a single organism, using what we have, to change so that we adjust. To the new world. In a way that uses everything – and everyone – that we have.

    1. Paul Tillich (1976), Systematic Theology 3. University of Chicago Press. ↩︎
    2. Ibid. ↩︎
  • Lane Departure

    I used to drive somewhat faster on the highway than I do now. I have been influenced to change by several factors: when we had children, I became concerned about safety; then I learned that most gasoline engines operate at peak efficiency at about 80 km/hr: therefore by slowing down I was saving money and reducing carbon emissions; and I worked for several years as an emergency room chaplain, where I met individuals who drove too quickly – or rather, I met their families, and helped with the viewing of the bodies.


    And I got older, and paradoxically came to the conclusion that life is too short to drive fast. But there is a limit to my speed limits.

    Where I live, the speed limit is 80. I have hearsay evidence that a local police officer recommended driving at 90 to avoid rear end collisions. I’m a rule follower but only to a point. So I usually drive around 90 km/hr on the local highway.


    Coming up the highway today there was a car ahead of me, following closely on a truck and trailer ahead of him (“he” is a generic pronoun – I have no idea who the drivers were).


    They slowed down. The car put on his brakes.


    The weather was good, the highway was straight, there was a dashed line, and there was no oncoming traffic. It was legal to pass.


    I signalled, pulled out, and checked to make sure that neither of the two vehicles ahead was signalling or turning left: they weren’t. The truck was turning right and the car was continuing to slow down behind him.


    I passed them both.

    All hell broke loose.

    The guy in the car leaned on his horn. I checked my path. There was no danger. There was perhaps outrage that I would dare not stay in my lane. After the truck turned, the car came tight on my bumper, and hung there. For several kilometres. Until we passed the police station. Then he pulled back. After the police station he pulled up again.


    It was interesting that he did not seem to think that the police would share his sense of injustice.

    I was concerned that he was going to follow me until I stopped. I decided that I didn’t want to have a chat with him. I turned off at a random intersection, let him pass, and continued on my way.


    We live in a curious time. A few years ago there was concern that we, as a species, were becoming too independent. We’re mammals, after all. And there is safety in the herd. But nobody seemed to care for anyone else’s safety.


    I don’t think that this guy in the car was concerned for my safety. That hasn’t changed.


    What was he concerned about?


    I think that he was upset that I wasn’t following his rules.


    On the anniversary of Hamas’s attack on Israel, I think that the same sort of thing is happening over there. We’re getting upset when people think, feel, or behave differently. For that matter, we do it here to our First Nations sisters and brothers. And to immigrants (no, they’re not eating the dogs).


    We’ve gone from independence (which in itself isn’t good for mammals) to something resembling kingship – with each of us as kings, demanding that everyone else do what we do.


    Otherwise, we are not amused and we will lean on our horns.


    One recalls Fritz Perls: “I do my thing and you do your thing. I am not in this world to live up to your expectations, and you are not in this world to live up to mine. You are you, and I am I, and if by chance we find each other, it’s beautiful.”


    I should put that on my bumper.

  • Two Roads Diverged

    I belong to an organization that has imploded recently. We were anxious about running a large public event after the pandemic. We divided into two camps: some of us had a lot of faith that we could pull this off and that it would be of benefit to a larger audience. Others were more cautious and concerned about costs.

    Our anxiety got the better of us, and we were not on our best behaviour as we talked with one another. We tried to persuade the other camp. We stopped listening. We escalated our attempts to persuade until we were clearly stepping out of our norms for talking to one another. We broke rules of civility, and rules of order. We called the other camp on their bad behaviour, oblivious to our own.

    It did not go well.

    Now you haven’t seen this anywhere else, have you? Republicans and Democrats? Liberals and Conservatives? Regional conflicts, pandemics, and climate change have us all on edge. Some of us want to help. Some of us want to build walls.

    I tend to demonize the Conservatives. I try to fight that. I understand that at heart their message is, “Don’t tire yourself out so much. Stay home. Rest. Here’s a tax break.”

    I lean towards the Liberals and their message: “There is so much need out there. Give before more people die.”

    “To which camp do you belong?” Is a trick question. Both have merit.

    Paul Tillich, a German theologian, argued that all life has to wrestle with these two conditions. Staying home he called “self-integrity”. Taking risks he called “self-alteration”.

    Even a single cell has to deal with self-integrity and self-alteration. If it just sits in the Petri dish, protecting itself, never venturing out, it starves. If it divides too quickly, or spreads itself out too far, it dissolves.

    How much more does a society have to wrestle with these twin goals of self-preservation and self-alteration. Life is a dialectic: stay home, and go out. You can’t stay home all the time or you’ll starve. You can’t stay out all the time or you’ll die of exhaustion. Find a balance that works for you, of protecting yourself, and venturing out to help others.

  • The Furnace

    This is from last year but as fall approaches I think of this again and I smile: my knee is much better. The bathroom is still not finished but it’s really close. And the furnace tech has forgiven me…

    I live in a rural area and winter is coming. There are a number of preparations. Crawl spaces under the house have to be sealed. Hoses have to be drained. The furnace and snowblower need to be serviced. It’s a lot of physical activity. I’m in decent shape but as I age I am becoming more prone to random injury.

    So there was a random injury.

    I have been renovating my bathroom. Took out the tub. Put in a shower pan. A very heavy shower pan. My son helped me get the pan into the bathroom. We left it leaning vertically against the wall while I measured to cut the hole for the drain. And then I had to lower the pan myself.

    No problem. I have a chain hoist. I made a tripod out of 2-by-4’s and slowly lowered the pan into position.

    I was pleased that it fit. And then I hooked up the plumbing. I crawled under the house and cut and fit new PVC pipe to connect the shower pan’s drain to the septic. And then I turned on the water to check my work: such a flood has not been seen since the time of Noah.

    Twice.

    Eventually and just in time for winter I got the plumbing fixed so that it doesn’t leak (I hope).

    And now I have a sore knee. I can walk on it, except when I have to go to the bathroom at night, which I do a lot, because I’m old and drink too much coffee…

    Notice that at any given time in your life, there are some things you can change, and some things you must accept. I could drink less coffee…

    But I was going to tell you about the furnace. We have a little propane forced air furnace that heats half the house. We had it serviced, all ready for winter, all checked out. On Thursday it stopped working.

    It’s a fancy furnace that flashes lights at you to tell you what’s wrong. Six flashes, break, one flash, break. I looked it up and it meant “soft lockout”, whatever that means.

    Wanting to sound knowledgeable I called up the furnace technician on Friday and said, “I have a soft lockout.”

    And he said, “What the hell is that?”

    And I said, “I don’t know, actually.”

    And he said – and he really said this – “Have you tried turning it off and on?”

    We were having this conversation while I was in town so I said, “No but I will tonight and let you know.” At the time it made sense, sort of. Maybe a “soft lockout” is something that happens when a furnace’s circuits get scrambled. I mean, even the tech hasn’t heard of a soft lockout, but who knows?

    (Narrator: That is not what a soft lockout is. And turning it off and on did not solve Carl’s problem.)

    Late Friday night, I turned the emergency switch to the furnace off, waited five minutes, and turned it on again. Turning the power off to the furnace worked to clear its circuits. Turning the power on, the furnace says, “Wow! A brand new day! Oh, a signal from the thermostat. Well, I must build a fire…” Whereupon the furnace gamely attempted to light. It does not have a pilot light. It has some kind of electronic ignition. For several minutes I heard the furnace trying to light.

    And meanwhile it’s flashing me, six flashes, repeat. Six flashes, repeat. So I looked that up. It means, “I can’t start the fire.”

    I know how it feels.

    And after several minutes the furnace became – much quieter. And flashing six and one. Soft lockout. Which now I realize means, “I tried to start the fire, it didn’t work, and I have given up.”

    Man, I know what you mean.

    I’m not in any danger of freezing. It’s not that cold. And I also have electric heat. And a fireplace.

    But I’m tired and cranky and my knee hurts and I tried “turning it off and on” and now I have an image of a curly-haired, bespectacled kid in IT not doing his job while I slowly freeze to death.

    I started to get mad. I know that I can reach the furnace tech’s boss by Facebook Messenger. I wrote the boss, “You serviced my furnace last month. It’s not working. And the tech told me to try turning it off and on.”

    Now I’m one of those Karens. I’ve gone to the manager to complain. And while I am partly justified, perhaps, the context of my complaint includes my sore knee due to activities that I unwisely undertook on my own that have nothing to do with the furnace.

    This will harm the relationship that I have with the furnace tech.

    But it felt good to email the boss on Friday night to complain that my life is not fair and it’s all his technician’s fault.

    I’m sorry.